In Atomfall, the FX-9370 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2689. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2689
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 115 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2689: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2689 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2689 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA2011 |
| 220W | Power Consumption | 115W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
