In Atomfall, the FX-9370 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2650L. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 191 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2650L
- Consumes up to 68% less energy – 70 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 68% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2650L: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2650L
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
189 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
99%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2650L in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2650L in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2650L
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
41%
Turbo Frequency
2.3 GHz
49%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2650L Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA2011 |
| 220W | Power Consumption | 70W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
