In Deathloop, the FX-9370 is same performance as the Xeon E5-2620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2620
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 95 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2620: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2620
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
![Intel Xeon E5-2620 V4 Octa-core [8 Core] 2.10 Ghz Processor - Socket R3 [lga2011-3]oem Pack - 2 Mb - 20 Mb Cache - 8 Gt/s Qpi - 64-bit Processing - 3 Ghz Overclocking Speed - 14 Nm - 85 W -](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0745CL6NF.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2620 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
53%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2620
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
45%
Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
53%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2620 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA2011 |
| 220W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
