In Deathloop, the FX-9370 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 220 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Feb 07, 2020 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2499.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
12%
L3 Cache
8 MB
3%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 7th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $3,990.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | TRX4 |
220W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
