In Deathloop, the FX-9370 is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer – Oct 03, 2018 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 180 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | SP3r2 |
| 220W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
