Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3494 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of FX-9370
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $212.02 vs $744.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $1.11 vs $3.24 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-9370 - 230 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 120 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $212.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.24/FPS
34%
Price, $
$744.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $744.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-9370 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |