The FX-9370 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $132.14 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 62% cheaper – $79.88 vs $212.02
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 65 vs 220 Watts
FX-9370 vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
195
100%
Min 1% FPS
108
100%
Price, $
$79.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
FX-9370 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-9370 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
