In The Last of Us Part I, the FX-9370 is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 241 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part I
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 125 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
211 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
87%
Price, $
$505.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.39/FPS
100%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
