In Atomfall, the FX-9370 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 65 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
