In Atomfall, the FX-9370 is slightly slower than the Core i7-980X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-980X
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 130 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 41% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Core i7-980X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Core i7-980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Core i7-980X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-980X Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 220W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
