In Rust, the FX-9370 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 233 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 65 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
233 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
