In Atomfall, the FX-9370 is slightly faster than the Core i5-650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Core i5-650
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 73 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 220W | Power Consumption | 73W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
