Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3494 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of FX-9370
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $212.02 vs $899.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-13400F - $1.26 vs $4.71 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Deathloop than FX-9370 - 191 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 16 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $212.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.71/FPS
27%
Price, $
$899.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-9370 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |