In Deathloop, the FX-9370 is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 35 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
57%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 220W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
