In Rust, the FX-9370 is same performance as the Celeron G3930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
No clear advantages
Celeron G3930
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 51 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
98%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 220W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
