The FX-8370E is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core Ultra 9 285 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $313.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8370E
- Up to 60% cheaper – $206.99 vs $520.00
Advantages of the Core Ultra 9 285
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
FX-8370E vs Core Ultra 9 285
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 4th, 2025
Average FPS
244
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, $
$520
39%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
54%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370E vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370E vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 4th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8370E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2025 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1851 |
| Vishera | Codename | Arrow Lake-S |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR5 @ 6400 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
