In Atomfall, the FX-8370 is slightly slower than the Xeon W3680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8370
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3680
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Xeon W3680: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Xeon W3680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Xeon W3680 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon W3680
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3680 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
125W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
