In Rust, the FX-8370 is slower than the Ryzen 7 5800X and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $35 more expensive!
FX-8370
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 5800X
- Up to 20% faster in Rust – 251 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 14% cheaper – $217.00 vs $252.02
- Up to 14% cheaper
- Up to 28% better value in Rust – $0.86 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 28% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Ryzen 7 5800X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
210 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
58%
Price, $
$252.02
86%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
72%
Ryzen 7 5800X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
72 FPS
100%
Price, $
$217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Ryzen 7 5800X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Ryzen 7 5800X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 7 5800X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5800X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $449.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM4 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
