In Deathloop, the FX-8370 is slightly slower than the Opteron 3365. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8370
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Jun 30, 2013
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer
Opteron 3365
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Opteron 3365: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Opteron 3365 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Opteron 3365 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Opteron 3365
Jun 30th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Opteron 3365 Jun 30th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 30th, 2013 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
