In Atomfall, the FX-8370 is slightly faster than the FX-4350. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $169 more expensive!
FX-8370
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
FX-4350
- Up to 67% cheaper – $82.71 vs $252.02
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Atomfall – $0.43 vs $1.32/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
100%
Price, $
$252.02
32%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
33%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
188 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
99%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
