The FX-8370 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the EPYC 7502, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $642.98 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8370
- Up to 72% cheaper – $252.02 vs $895.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the EPYC 7502
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 8 threads
FX-8370 vs EPYC 7502
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-8370 vs EPYC 7502 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs EPYC 7502 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs EPYC 7502 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
EPYC 7502
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8370 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7502 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Rome |
125 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
4.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
