In Dead Space, the FX-8370 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $47 cheaper!
FX-8370
- Up to 16% cheaper – $252.02 vs $298.98
- Up to 16% cheaper
- Up to 11% better value in Dead Space – $1.44 vs $1.61/FPS
- Up to 11% better value in Dead Space
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 6% faster in Dead Space – 185 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Dead Space
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
174 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
86%
Price, $
$252.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
185 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
103 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
84%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
89%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
