In Stray, the FX-8370 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8370
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 1% faster in Stray – 285 vs 282 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Stray
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Stray FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
285 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
203 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
