In Control, the FX-8370 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $195 cheaper!
FX-8370
- Up to 44% cheaper – $252.02 vs $447.16
- Up to 44% cheaper
- Up to 42% better value in Control – $1.02 vs $1.75/FPS
- Up to 42% better value in Control
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 4% faster in Control – 255 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Control
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
Control FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
246 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
96%
Price, $
$252.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
255 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$447.16
56%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
58%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
