In The Last of Us Part I, the FX-8370 is slightly faster than the Core i9-13900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $297 cheaper!
FX-8370
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 240 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 54% cheaper – $252.02 vs $548.89
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 59% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $1.05 vs $2.57/FPS
- Up to 59% better value in The Last of Us Part I
Core i9-13900K
- Is 8 years and 25 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 8 years and 25 days newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$252.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
213 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
88%
Price, $
$548.89
45%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
41%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
