In Rust, the FX-8370 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $78 cheaper!
FX-8370
- Up to 24% cheaper – $252.02 vs $329.95
- Up to 24% cheaper
- Up to 15% better value in Rust – $1.20 vs $1.41/FPS
- Up to 15% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 233 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
209 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
70%
Price, $
$252.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
233 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
76%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
85%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
