In Rust, the FX-8370 is slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8370
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 22% faster in Rust – 255 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
209 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
55%
Price, $
$252.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
