In Deathloop, the FX-8370 is same performance as the Core i3-3210. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $93 more expensive!
FX-8370
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
Core i3-3210
- Up to 37% cheaper – $159.00 vs $252.02
- Up to 37% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in Deathloop – $0.71 vs $1.14/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Core i3-3210: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$252.02
63%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
62%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
