In Helldivers 2, the FX-8370 is slightly slower than the Celeron G1610. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8370
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
Celeron G1610
- Up to 1% faster in Helldivers 2 – 191 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Helldivers 2
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Helldivers 2 FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
191 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
133 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
