In Rust, the FX-8370 is slightly faster than the Celeron B820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8370
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 210 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Jul 01, 2012
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Celeron B820: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Celeron B820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Celeron B820 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
42%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2012 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
