In Deathloop, the FX-8370 is slightly slower than the Celeron 2955U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8370
- Is 1 year newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 1 year newer
Celeron 2955U
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 225 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8370 vs Celeron 2955U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Celeron 2955U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Celeron 2955U in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Celeron 2955U
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
35%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 2955U Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 15W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
