In Atomfall, the FX-8350 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2609. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8350
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 months and 17 days newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 months and 17 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2609
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8350 vs Xeon E5-2609: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
189 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
100%
Price, $
$258.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8350 vs Xeon E5-2609 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8350 vs Xeon E5-2609 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8350 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2609 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA2011 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
