In Atomfall, the FX-8350 is slightly faster than the FX-8320. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $170 more expensive!
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8350 vs FX-8320: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
189 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
100%
Price, $
$258.02
34%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
34%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
99%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8350 vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8350 vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8350 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
