In Atomfall, the FX-8350 is slightly faster than the FX-8120. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $220 more expensive!
FX-8350
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 11 days newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 1 year and 11 days newer
FX-8120
- Up to 85% cheaper – $38.10 vs $258.02
- Up to 85% cheaper
- Up to 85% better value in Atomfall – $0.20 vs $1.37/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8350 vs FX-8120: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$258.02
14%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
15%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
187 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
99%
Price, $
$38.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8350 vs FX-8120 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8350 vs FX-8120 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8350 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8120 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
