In Atomfall, the FX-8350 is slightly faster than the FX-6200. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $225 more expensive!
FX-8350
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 months and 25 days newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Feb 27, 2012
- Is 7 months and 25 days newer
FX-6200
- Up to 87% cheaper – $32.97 vs $258.02
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in Atomfall – $0.17 vs $1.35/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8350 vs FX-6200: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$258.02
12%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
13%
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
99%
Price, $
$32.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8350 vs FX-6200 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8350 vs FX-6200 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8350 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6200 Feb 27th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
