In Rust, the FX-8350 is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $41 cheaper!
FX-8350
- Up to 14% cheaper – $258.02 vs $298.98
- Up to 14% cheaper
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 35% faster in Rust – 284 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 35% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer
- Up to 14% better value in Rust – $1.05 vs $1.22/FPS
- Up to 14% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8350 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
210 FPS
74%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
45%
Price, $
$258.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
86%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
284 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
86%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8350 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8350 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8350 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
