In Atomfall, the FX-8350 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $43 more expensive!
FX-8350
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer
- Up to 17% cheaper – $214.99 vs $258.02
- Up to 17% cheaper
- Up to 36% better value in Atomfall – $0.87 vs $1.35/FPS
- Up to 36% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8350 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
78%
Price, $
$258.02
83%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
64%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8350 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8350 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8350 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
