In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8350 is faster than the Core i3-14100. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $109 more expensive!
FX-8350
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Core i3-14100
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 42% cheaper – $149.35 vs $258.02
- Up to 42% cheaper
- Up to 32% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.88 vs $1.30/FPS
- Up to 32% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 60 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8350 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
198 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$258.02
57%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
68%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
86%
Price, $
$149.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8350 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8350 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8350 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
