In Atomfall, the FX-8350 is slightly faster than the Celeron B820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8350
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 months and 22 days newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Jul 01, 2012
- Is 3 months and 22 days newer
Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8350 vs Celeron B820: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$258.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8350 vs Celeron B820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8350 vs Celeron B820 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
42%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8350 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2012 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
