In Deathloop, the FX-8320E is same performance as the Xeon E5640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320E
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5640
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Xeon E5640: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Xeon E5640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Xeon E5640 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
