Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3046 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of FX-8320E
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $178.02 vs $744.95
- Up to 73% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.84 vs $3.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-8320E - 236 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7182 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
236
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
27%
Price, $
$744.95
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $744.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7182 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |