Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1769 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-8320E - 219 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than FX-8320E - $93.99 vs $178.02
- Up to 49% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-8320E - $0.43 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7198 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7199 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |