The FX-8320E is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 1600X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $63.02 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 1600X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 35% cheaper – $115.00 vs $178.02
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 1600X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
200
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 1600X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 1600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 1600X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
$1.47 | MSRP | $2.49 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Vishera | Codename | Zen |
95 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |