The FX-8320E is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3300X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $67.03 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3300X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 38% cheaper – $110.99 vs $178.02
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
FX-8320E vs Ryzen 3 3300X
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3300X
Apr 24th, 2020
Average FPS
209
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, $
$110.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Ryzen 3 3300X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 3 3300X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 3 3300X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 3 3300X
Apr 24th, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | $120.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
