In Atomfall, the FX-8320E is slightly slower than the FX-8370. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $74 cheaper!
FX-8320E
- Up to 29% cheaper – $178.02 vs $252.02
- Up to 29% cheaper
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall – $0.93 vs $1.31/FPS
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
FX-8370
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 191 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
190 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
99%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
191 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$252.02
70%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
71%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
95W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
