In Minecraft, the FX-8320E is same performance as the FX-8150. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $127 more expensive!
FX-8320E
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
FX-8150
- Up to 71% cheaper – $51.29 vs $178.02
- Up to 71% cheaper
- Up to 75% better value in Minecraft – $0.04 vs $0.16/FPS
- Up to 75% better value in Minecraft
Minecraft FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs FX-8150: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
1058 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
188 FPS
99%
Price, $
$178.02
28%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
25%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
1058 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
189 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
95W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
