In The Last of Us Part I, the FX-8320E is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 7 265K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320E
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 242 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
