In Battlefield 1, the FX-8320E is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320E
No clear advantages
Core i9-12900T
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 1 – 269 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 1
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Battlefield 1 FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core i9-12900T: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
245 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i9-12900T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i9-12900T in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i9-12900T
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
44%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900T Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $489.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
