In GRID, the FX-8320E is same performance as the Core i9-12900H. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320E
No clear advantages
Core i9-12900H
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
GRID FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core i9-12900H: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
485 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
292 FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i9-12900H in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i9-12900H in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i9-12900H
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900H Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 1744 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Iris Xe 96EU |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
