In Dead Space, the FX-8320E is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700K. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $22 cheaper!
FX-8320E
- Up to 11% cheaper – $178.02 vs $199.99
- Up to 11% cheaper
- Up to 10% better value in Dead Space – $1.01 vs $1.12/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Dead Space
Core i7-9700K
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 177 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core i7-9700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
175 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
96%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
177 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
89%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
90%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
